Friday, May 04, 2007

Britney is a freak. And not sexy at all.

ew. ew. wrong.

10 comments:

RWgirl said...

And had bruises on her leg?

Dingo said...

HOT HOT HOT.

How long before she dies?

Seumas said...

Bruises on the legs? Clumbsy and trampy.

Bruises on the inner thighs? Hot!

But what the hell is she thinking? Teasing with a little glimpse of some (but not all) of your flesh is pointless AFTER you've already gaped your huge flapping-labia vagina at the camera!

You're doing it all backwards, you whore!

redrevo said...

If it wasn't Britney it would actually be an endearing picture.
However, it is Britney and that makes it weird. Furthering the weirdness is the fact the photo is public, which begs the question, what is she trying to accomplish? Is trying to transform her image into something a bit more wholesome and sensual rather than drunk and whore-y? Whatever it is it is not working.

COMMENT DELETED said...

I she wearing cowboy boots?

Not that i care as long as I can stare at that veiny chest! What temp of corn syrup would them things compare too?

Shovelhead said...

Chubby (not the kiddie cute kind, either), out-of-shape-flabby, pasty white, bruised, plus the pix is badly posed and the lighting is terrible. She is doing a breast thrust-up (to disguise the fact her bags are now fat-saggy) and hiding her scalp which covered in stubbly nubs.

A far, far fall from her pleated skirt days on MTV.

As Seumas posit's - what's IS the point of this "coy" shot when 100,000,000 have gazed up your Federline-spawn stretched vagina?

Diana from Downtown said...

Dudes, she's not wearing shorts, she wearing a skirt....so she's still flashing her flabby vulva at us (shudder)

Richard said...

Justin Timberlake got out just in time...

Richard said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Steve said...

Pathetic, really.

And to think that once upon a time, she was every white man's wet dream...