Tuesday, November 28, 2006

good fucking god.

Okay, sorry, I know my language isn't safe for work, but jesus fucking christ - what is Britney Spears doing?? These pictures are too vulgar for even ME to post, and that's saying something.

So, last night Britney decided to go out -again- with Paris Hilton, and ONCE AGAIN SANS PANTIES! Why, Britney? That is so gross and wrong and saggy and gross and wrong! Keep your naughty bits tucked away! I don't want to see your vag, let alone your c-section scar (yes, the pictures show her from belly-button to ass - sick). So, since I don't want to post these, I'll direct you to the fine fellows at What Would Tyler Durden Do? who have them up for your viewing pleasure. Enjoy! Throw up!

source

EDIT: Here is a safe-for-work picture of Britney's ass from a couple of nights ago when she was out with Paris Hilton. Why, Britney, Why?

9 comments:

Evil said...

JEEBUZ KRUST!!! That girl is beyond help. Just let her go Sara!

gay bob said...

I see the Skanky McHo lessons have kicked in!

Anonymous said...

She is too fucked up for words at this point.

seumas said...

I literally got icky grossed-out shivers up and down my spine from that photo. Gross. GROSS.

I mean, if you're an average chick maybe that ain't that bad. But come on, Britney Spears can't have giant sagging avalanche ass!

Anonymous said...

OMG!! I'd assume this had to be a photoshop (and, a damn good one)except all the flaws and the goddamn c-section scar are plainly visible! This is real. Geez - even the SE 82nd Ave ho's wear underwear. Hope someone burns that car seat!

Jareth said...

Do you think timberlake see's the paparazzi photos and just projectally vomits?

Greg in Canby said...

well, are we sounding like our parents? Naughty parts? Not to be seen? Some cultures celebrate the rose of a woman. If this was an elbow, ankle or breast -- would we react the same?
Two hundred years ago, a woman's ankle was shocking.
Do we see the world as it is or do we see it as we are socialized?

If a woman chooses to be photographed naked, is that wrong?
Do we really want another generation thinking 'down there' is somehow less natural or beautiful?

Just saying......


Greg in Canby

seumas said...

Greg is probably "being funny", but assuming it's serious:

The human body - women included - is typically pretty fucking gross. Second, the drunk, flabby, wobbly, cottage-cheesy human-body is not "beautiful". Nobody wants to see the fat hairy guy wandering around the beach in bright red speedos and nobody wants to see Britney's flabby ass or gaping albia hanging down to the back of her knees as she drunkenly gets behind the wheel.

That "the naked woman is a glorious naked rose" thing might work with the hairy women's literature chicks at OSU, but the rest of us know the difference between hot naked shots and floppy drunken naked shots that make us want to puke in our own mouths.


"If this was an elbow, ankle or breast -- would we react the same?"

You must be new here . . . (hint: YES)

Anonymous said...

eeeyywwee, it looks like she sat in chewed gum. please make her go away......